Sanctuary city is a concept that openly and boldly challenges the Constitution of the USA. Its existence must only function to dismantle the Constitution and divide this country. It is absolutely violating the purpose of common defense provided in the preamble, which is stated in the following:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
If the US politicians ever have people who genuinely understand the Constitution and truly possess the will and soul to defend America, they should have long trashed the outcry of sanctuary city, allowing no single inch of land for it to stay. But now, this evil concept is endowed with a halo of democracy, poised to file lawsuit against the US president’s move of stopping its funding.
- The US president, the current one or all who preceded, does not seem to know he could and should use executive power to immediately crush all sanctuary communities and no court procedure or Congress debate can stay in his way; any sanctuary community exists in the form against common defenseis insurrection, and should be removed without negotiation. Need to waste time and energy to attack them via funding? No kidding! “…I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
- A big number of the Congress members are now preparing themselves to show support or opposition to the president on this issue. If they feel the need to give even one second of time for the negotiation on the matter of sanctuary cities, American people should ask where the Congress gets the power to allow insurrection gaining legal status to negotiate. As a matter of fact, if they ever have any sense about the Constitution, they should have long ago pressed the president to have any sanctuary city removed.
- US Supreme Court is a joke. It has a long history in pioneering the destruction of the US Constitution in the name of explaining and defending the Constitution. If it ever accepts to preside over a lawsuit in which any sanctuary city is a plaintiff, the Court would have implicitly and preemptively asked people to accept the sanctuary city as an entity with legality and legitimacy no lower than common defense emphasized in the Constitution.
American people have been misled for too long by their politicians on the understanding of the US Constitution. Some politicians even make themselves ready to collapse the current Constitution for their personal gain. For this purpose, they put up all kinds of lies and misconception to noose people’s mind, such as that sanctuary cities are a democratic practice in this country. Really? The Constitution must have statement to destroy itself in order to be complete? Some serious review on the US Constitution is critically needed to the continuing existence of this country. There will be more lectures coming in this hall. Everyone is cordially invited.